THE VIETNAM WAR LIE ADMITTED up on 10/14/2009

Benjamin Fulford, Illuminati insider and Ex-Forbes director, addresses the New World Order and threatens them if they do not turn! The Illuminati is a secret society that has been around since 1776, they want to create a one world government, a "New World Order," with themselves in charge. The Illuminati are generally powerful and rich people. The Illuminati will kill anyone, anywhere at any time to get what they need. The people that are "Anti-New World Order" and speak out against the Illuminati will be murdered like 2Pac and Michael Jackson. 2Pac and Michael Jackson were going to warn the entire world about what the Illuminati are planning. If you look at the title of 2Pac's album "The Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory" for example; 2Pac was referring to the Illuminati in this title, Kill + Illuminati. In the song "They Don't Care About Us" by Michael Jackson, "they" is the Illuminati. The Illuminati killed 2Pac, Michael Jackson, Bob Marley, Marilyn Monroe, Jon Lennon, Jimi Hendrix, John F. Kennedy, Abe Lincoln, Princess Diana, Martin Luther King, the list goes on. The Illuminati control everything, the music industry, film industry, pharmaceutical (legal industry), medical industry, colleges, banking institutions, Wall Street and the Political System. Their symbol is even on our money. The Illuminati control our Presidential Elections. Usually the president, who gets the most sponsorship, in the form of money and media coverage, wins the election. The Illuminati control the media, so whoever the Illuminati choose as a presidential candidate will win the election. They will also sponsor the other candidate too, to have entertainment for the public. Sometimes this does not always go according to plan, for example, in the election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. In Florida George W. Bush "won" over Al Gore. The Illuminati cheated so that their pre-elected candidate would win presidency. The Illuminati choose the presidential candidate with the closest blood lines. These are the thirteen families in the Illuminati: 1. Astor 2. Bundy 3. Collins 4. DuPont 5. Freeman 6. Kennedy 7. Li (Chinese) 8. Onassis 9. Rockefeller 10. Rothschild 11. Russell 12. van Duyn 13. Merovingian (European Royal Families) These families have "ties" with the Illuminati: 1. Reynolds 2. Disney 3. Krupp 4. McDonald Most of the major wars and economic depressions/recessions of the past 100 years were carefully planned out by the Illuminati. Some of these include: The Spanish-American War, WWI, WWII, The Great Depression, the Rise of Nazi Germany, Korean War, Vietnam War, 1991 Gulf War and French Revolution. Do you remember all of the unnecessary hype about the New Millennium, or the alleged Y2K crisis? This hype was created by the Illuminati. This had people selling their homes, building shelters, stocking up on survival kits, etc. The Illuminati are also building hype for a 2012 phenomenon. I do not think that anything major is going to happen in 2012. When 2012 comes and goes, it will be shown to be the biggest hoax since the Y2K phenomenon. LICENSE INFORMATION: Under Creative Commons Licence, type CC BY - REUSE ALLOWED INCLUDING FOR COMMERCIAL USE! Check attributions link below video for source video and credits.

Amazing new evidence suggests Mainstream Media colluded with the terrorists/illuminati on 9/11.

Follow a LRRP in the Central Highlands, filmed in a documentary style that immerses you into the atmosphere and gives you a glimpse into the hardship endured by soldiers in Vietnam. www.imdb.com/title/tt0096744/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Martin Luther King Jr. Speaks Against The Vietnam War... The speech is very timeless and relevant even by today's standards. What's going on in the world today?

Congressman Ron Paul warns of a contrived incident to provoke war with Iran, a "Gulf of Tonkin" type incident, January 11, 2006.

Subscribe and follow our activism movies: www.Youtube.com/XKUNXEntertainment www.Facebook.com/XKUNXEntertainment Activism - Vietnam Story - Jedi Mind Tricks

Beneath the hype Pt.3: US intelligence experts Ray McGovern & Greg Thielmann weigh-in on the consequences of US silence regarding Israel's nuclear weapons

I find it interesting that between 2007 and 2009 all of a sudden all of these people that were standing their ground for seeking out the truth under the lie's and deception they were told all of a sudden decided to commit suicide or were found dead in sum cases crushed by their own car. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COINCIDENCE IN GOVERNMENT ESPECIALLY WHERE THE SAME PERSON OR GROUP LIKE THE ILLUMINATI OR THE BUSH FAMILY KISSINGER ROCKEFELLER ROTHCHILD AND YES EVEN THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND ARE LINKED.!!!

The Gulf of Tonkin incident in early August of 1964 is a key point in American History. It is the flash of armed conflict that formally brought the United States into the Vietnam War (or, "American War" as the Vietnamese call it) through the passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. The actual history of this incident got all entangled in the politics of the time and resulted in a conventional wisdom/urban myth which is 180 degrees from the actual facts of what went down. In this program, Admiral Lloyd "Joe" Vasey, who investigated the incident contemporaneously, now sets the record straight. Interviewed by David Day, this is the very same Admiral Vasey that served as a junior officer to John McCain, Sr (Senator McCain's father) during WW II and is the founder of the distinguished foreign policy thinktank in the Asia-Pacific Region, Pacific Forum, CSIS. At the time this program was recorded, Admiral Vasey was 95 years old. Admiral Vasey was Chief of Staff for Commander Seventh Fleet. Subsequently, he commanded a fleet of destroyers, was Secretary to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and chief strategist for CINCPAC. He served as a submarine officer in the invasion of North Africa and then in the Pacific through World War II. There were 2 U.S. destroyers involved in the Gulf of Tonkin incident. The first, the USS Maddox was fired upon on August 2, 1964. There was no dispute that the Maddox was engaged on August 2. There was a bullet hole in the ship to prove it. Because the Maddox carried sensitive and classified electronic equipment onboard, the USS Turner Joy was immediately dispatched to defend the Maddox and got between the Maddox and the incoming North Vietnamese patrol craft as its "shield." It is the August 4 attacks on the Turner Joy that have been disputed by history. Admiral Vasey corrects the twisted history here.

Actually, Robert Mc Namara and most of American political establishment were correct about the values. If somebody tries to disobey us, our values are that they have to be crushed and massacred. Those are our values. They go back hundreds of years, and those are exactly the values they acted upon. Kennedy's, Johnson's, Mc Namara's etc belief that it was a mistake may be incorrect. US policy has been criticized by the doves who say: " You came around too late" and by the hawks who say, "Well, it was a victory". And the hawks are right, it was a victory. So, it wasn't a mistake. People like Mc Namara didn't understand that. They doesn't understand very much, incidentally. The one interesting aspect is how little many Americans understood and still understand about what was going on or understands today. Mc Namara and most of Americans don't even understand what they were involved in. Mc Namara implemented orders, of course. One decision was in November and December 1961, when the internal resistance was overthrowing the U.S. client regime after it had already killed probably 80 000 people, eliciting internal resistance which Washington's terror state couldn't withstand. Kennedy just turned from straight terror, which it had been before, to outright aggression. They unleashed the American air force against Vietnamese villagers, authorized napalm, started crop destruction. They also started attacks against the North, which was not involved seriously at the time. That was the first big decision. Mc Namara didn't even mention it. He was concealing anything. He thought of it as a decision. Because, after all, Americans were just slaughtering South Vietnamese, and that doesn't harm Americans at all. So why shouldn't they do it? Nobody's going to get angry. Nobody's going to harm USA if they kill South Vietnamese. So, when Johnson sent U.S. planes to napalm Vietnamese villages, what could be the problem? So that's not even mentioned. The killing was mostly in South Vietnam. The attack was mostly against South Vietnam. The Pentagon Papers were not very revealing, contrary to what people say. But one of the very few interesting things about the Pentagon Papers was the disparity between the planning for the bombing of the North and the planning for the bombing of the South. On the bombing of the North, there was meticulous detailed planning. How far should USA go? At what rate? What targets? The bombing of the South, at three times the rate and with far more vicious consequences, was unplanned. There's no discussion about it. Why? Very simple. The bombing of the North might cause Americans problems. When Americans started bombing the North, they were bombing, for example, Chinese railroads, which happened to go right through North Vietnam. USA were going to hit Russian ships, as they did. And there could be a reaction somewhere in the world that might harm USA. So therefore that you have to plan for. But massacring people in South Vietnam, nothing. B-52 bombing of the Mekong Delta, one of the most densely populated areas in the world, destroying hospitals and dams, nobody's going to bother us about that. So that doesn't require any planning or evaluation. Bernard Fall, was a French military historian and Indochina specialist and a big hawk, incidentally. He describes how he flew with the American planes when they napalmed villages, destroyed hospitals. He described it very graphically. He was infuriated about it, but he describes it. Fall mentioned in 1965 about these guys - Americans - are such murderous maniacs that they may succeed in destroying the country. In that sense, he thought it was going to work. 1967 he changed his mind about the efficacy of American actions and took a more pessimistic view about the prospects for an American victory. That was 1967. Fall said Vietnam is literally dying under the worst attack that any country has ever suffered and it was very likely that Vietnam as a cultural and historical entity was going to become extinct under the American attack.